At Carlisle Barracks in early 1852, Lt Col Cooke feuds with Capt John Love

A formation of cavalry troops at Carlisle Barracks, April 1861

Photographer:  Charles Lochman.

The original of this image is held in the Cumberland County Historical Society in Carlisle, Pennsylvania.

Update:  For Love's side, see part of his 1851 complaint here.

In a previous post we showed how the popularity of "Human Destiny" pontificators really annoyed the narrator of Scenes Beyond the Western Border, and Herman Melville--at about the same time, and just when Orville Dewey was wowing New York crowds in January and February 1852 with his popular lecture series on "The Problem of Human Destiny."

To get at this another way, we might ask, what was Philip St George Cooke doing during the writing of this:

 C.  "But even science is at fault—philosophy at a discount. The public mind is occupied with the theorism of demagogues and infidels, who, abandoning themselves to licentious speculations on human destiny, attract multitudes of fanatical followers, whose minds they bewilder, and whose morals they debase." (June 1852; and Scenes and Adventures in the Army)

In early 1852 Cooke was still commander of the post at Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, in charge of recruiting for cavalry service and training new recruits. Biographer Otis E. Young could only guess at Cooke's daily activities:

"In the absence of his diaries, only conjecture can supply the details of Major Cooke's life during his stay at Carlisle Barracks."  (The West of Philip St George Cooke p243)

However, with records from the National Archives now conveniently accessible through Fold3, a good deal more can now be said.  In 1852 alone Cooke wrote at least 47 letters to the Adjutant General.  Letters from Cooke to the AGO show one thing Cooke was definitely doing at Carlisle Barracks in January and February 1852, and that is feuding with John Love (1820-1881).  The Indiana Historical Society holds a collection of John Love Papers which I have not yet seen, as does the University of Michigan, but documents in the National Archives tell Cooke's side of the story.

On February 8, 1852 Cooke confided:

his [John Love's] coming here on the 17^th January—without authority—and failing in his duty to report to me, was it appears, the second time he has done the same thing.  His conduct now—whether to have cause of complaint or not—is a defiance of legal orders and authority.

I strive to maintain discipline; but do so with all kindness & courtesy until it is repelled, & misunderstood; but I cannot maintain discipline, and respect—my own respect—for my station, if this officer is sustained in his course.  Consequently, under par. 757 of the regulations, I report that the good of the service demands that Capt. Love be sent to his company.

On Valentine's Day 1852, Cooke forwarded to the AGO with his January accounts, a letter he had written Love at the recruiting station in Harrisburg on February 12, 1852:

Sir,

I have just received back your monthly return for January uncorrected; you say you “can find no error” in it.

I have your December return before me which you sent to me wrong; not making “transferred to principal Depot,” the seven men which came here “December 18th & 31^st.  I returned it for correction and it came back with that error corrected, and reads, “1, total of parties and recruits present & absent.”  …I had to write to you January 7^th to correct still another error, viz: “Insert in your retained copy of your monthly return 1 “joined from General Depot, and it will then be complete.”  This showed plainly that I not only took pains to instruct you to make the return right, but to inform you of your duty to keep a correct office copy.  Now, in the uncorrected January return, you report that “Total of parties & recruits last return,” 8:  that return says, “1”;--  The  January Return gives your num comm'd per party “2,” & disposable recurits "1"; these form, of course, your “total of parties & recruits”; well, 2 & 1 make 3, but you report “6.”  Now could you not find out these errors?

All this confusion arose in the enlisting and sending off but eleven men, & in about six weeks, an account which it seems to me, you could have kept without the assistance of pen and paper.

But, I sent back your January return with the usual sum (in addition and substraction) of proof, plainly marked in pencil:  thus,

8
4
1
13
  3
10

This I thought would indicate to you at least one error; viz. that according to your return you had 10 total of parties & recruits to account for, instead of 6, as you have it.  But it appears the Adjutant General thought the error of your report “apparent on its face,” without the assistance of these significant pencil marks, for it shows, they have been rubbed off.

I trust that now, you will be able to send me a correct return for January.  The errors were so palpable to me, that I did not think it necessary to point them out at first more particularly than I did; if you had asked me, I would with pleasure have given you all this information; & with our close vicinity, a correct return could, long ago, have been received; but, even now you do not ask to have the errors pointed out, but report that you cannot find them.

I cannot possibly grant the leave of absence you have asked, until this duty be satisfactorily performed. 

I am sir,
Respectfully,
Yr. ob't serv't
P St Geo Cooke
Maj. 2nd Drag[oon]s B[revet] Lt Col.
Superintendent

Below, a link to the page from the February 12, 1852 letter at fold3.com  Check it out and see the pains Cooke takes to correct Love's arithmetic:

Page 5

down on the philosophy of Human Destiny

Look to the right and you will see links to monthly installments of the magazine series Scenes Beyond the Western Border.  Taken together the series forms part two of the 1857 book Scenes and Adventures in the Army.  Many fine previous commentators (Hamilton Gardner, Otis E Young) on the book did not know about earlier printings of the same material in newspapers and magazines including the Southern Literary Messenger.  The late date of the book mostly reflects the difficulties Lt. Colonel Cooke had with getting the thing published.  Seeing the magazine installments month-by-month more precisely and usefully situates the writing, especially the freewheeling prairie dialogues between the narrator and his imaginary friend, in 1851-1853.

Besides all the verbal and thematic correspondences shown relentlessly on this blog, the chronology of publication dates matches up surprisingly well to known milestones and moods of Herman Melville during the same period.

The series begins in June 1851, with the narrator sounding cocky and confident like Melville did, about to wrap up Moby-Dick.  Looking to make a friend of one ideal reader, the "Captain of U. S. Dragoons" even talks like Melville to Hawthorne, promising to do all the work of socializing.  Early on, the chatty survey of books and ideas covers the subjects discussed by Melville and Hawthorne, who named some in his journal entry for August 2, 1851:

“time and eternity, things of this world and of the next, and books, and publishers, and all possible and impossible matters.”  (quoted in Hershel Parker's biography, V2.8)

Or in another view, the early installments of Scenes Beyond the Western Border effectively flesh out "A Week on a Work-Bench in a Barn," the book Melville and Hawthorne reportedly planned after Thoreau, to memorialize their conversations.

The mood shifts in December 1851, as the imaginary friend starts to sound less like idealized Hawthorne and more like Melville's critical friend Evert Duyckinck:

 ... as your old fashioned friend, I feel interested in your surface wanderings; but let your double-refined poetry and romance go 'to the D—.'" (Scenes Beyond the Western Border)

The amazingly self-aware critique of poetry and romance continues for the rest of the series.  References to motherhood and nursing infants occur only after the birth of Melville's son Stanwix in October 1851.  The bizarre and inappropriate if not inexplicable rant on foreign books and international copyright in September 1852 follows Melville's discouraging correspondence in March-April 1852 with Richard Bentley, his London publisher.  Bentley had based his low estimation of Pierre on copyright concerns and lousy sales of previous works.  Copyright provided editorial grist for New York newspapers, as Parker shows in columns that must have caught Melville's attention (Melville Biography: An Inside Narrative 402-7).  The Harpers and New York Times promoted Dickens over American authors while Greeley and the Tribune defended them and promoted international copyright.

In September 1852, the Captain of U. S. Dragoons (ostensibly writing in July 1845) seems oddly, personally immersed in these New York newspaper wars of spring 1852, complaining bitterly about "cockney condescension" abroad and "foreign-fashion loving public taste" at home:

And then the infernal trash—much of it from the stews of Paris and London—utterly undersells us, to the almost total suppression of native labour; and to the robbery too of the best foreign authors, whose works would command a copyright.

So much for the fourth of July,—and a dry one!  (September 1852) 

The March 1853 episode of the grizzly bear cub, presented as a mock tragedy, wittily twists negative reviews of Melville's Pierre.  In August 1853, the concluding number, in dialogue between the narrator and his imaginary friend, (named Frank since August 1852) incorporates key terms deployed by Evert and George Duyckinck in their review of Pierre for the New York Literary World.

OK, I said all that to say this, on the subject of Human Destiny in Scenes Beyond the Western Border.  Now then, the matter of 1843 is concluded in January 1852.  After two months off, the series resumes in April 1852 with a new subject, the matter of the 1845 dragoon expedition to the Rocky Mountains.

Having of necessity dropped the source material in Cooke's 1843 Santa Fe Journal, the writer or ghostwriter confronting new matter of 1845 needed new sources.  He found the first one in
Oregon, Ho!, first printed over the signature of "St George" in the Washington National Intelligencer, July 15, 1845. 

Examining the revisions to Oregon, Ho! in April 1852, we find the writer now cynically regarding the Oregon emigrants as "unconscious workers of National Human Destiny."  Our narrating Captain of U. S. Dragoons views westward expansion as a second fall, a comparison that Melville saved for Clarel.

They scorn all royal paper claims to this virgin world of ours! The best diplomatists of us all, they would conquer the land as easily as, — Adam lost Paradise.
(Scenes Beyond the Western Border, April 1852; and  Scenes and Adventures in the Army)

 Whatever happen in the end, 
Be sure 'twill yield to one and all
New confirmation of the fall
Of Adam. Sequel may ensue,
Indeed, whose germs one now may view:
Myriads playing pygmy parts-- 
Debased into equality:
In glut of all material arts
A civic barbarism may be:
Man disennobled--brutalized
By popular science--Atheized 
Into a smatterer " (Clarel 4.21)

The fixation with Human Destiny persists into the June 1852 number--possibly indicating a cluster of 1852 installments, April-May-June, apparently composed and submitted together.  In late January and February 1852, Orville Dewey had repeated his Lowell lectures on the Problem of Human Destiny at the Church of the Messiah in New York City.  Melville wrote a dig at Human Destiny lecturers into book 17 of Pierre, then the Captain of U.S. Dragoons railed at "demagogues and infidels" who wowed crowds with "licentious speculations on human destiny":

C.  "But even science is at fault—philosophy at a discount. The public mind is occupied with the theorism of demagogues and infidels, who, abandoning themselves to licentious speculations on human destiny, attract multitudes of fanatical followers, whose minds they bewilder, and whose morals they debase." (June 1852; and Scenes and Adventures in the Army)

The celebrated Rev. Orville Dewey, a demagogue and infidel?

What's more, a licentious infidel. Debasing the masses with marketable science or "philosophy at a discount."

Who talks like that?  Melville's Ungar the self-exiled soldier, for one, denouncing "popular science" in the lines from Clarel quoted above.  Also Babbalanja in Mardi, musing on the popularity of theorists.  And Ahab, contemplating the whale's head that has voicelessly witnessed enough to "make an infidel of Abraham."

And Melville as Pierre's biographer who disparages "infidel levities" and "infidel-minded" knaves.

Curiously, another bit from one of Dewey's Manhattan lectures on Human Destiny also made its way into the same June 1852 installment with the denunciation of Human Destiny demagogues.  As reported in the New York Daily Tribune for Thursday, February 5, 1852, Dewey's third NYC lecture at the Church of the Messiah considered laughter as a unique feature of "human organization, regarded in its connection with the formation of character and the development of mind":

Another important element in his training to higher ends is the faculty of laughter.  The animals are not endowed with this power, unless the grinning of monkeys is an exception.  This is not merely an expression of the sense of the ludicrous.  Laughter is the symbol of a contented mind, of a genial fellowship, of a comfortable sense of satisfaction, and tends to unite the scattered elements of society in a common feeling of fraternity.  Its influence on health is not to be overlooked.  An explosion of laughter is an excellent aid to digestion.  Superior to old wine, or old cheese, or other celebrated peptic persuaders.

In the June 1852 installment of Scenes Beyond the Western Border, one of the prairie dialogues makes use of Dewey's theme, as follows:

C.   "....Strange, that laughter, man's lowest attribute, is distinctive; while the smile, which seems borrowed from Heaven, and which can confer rapturous joy, if not happiness, is shared, I think, in a slight degree by brutes."   

(Scenes Beyond the Western Border, Southern Literary Messenger, June 1852); and
Scenes and Adventures in the Army

Melville took up the same theme in The Confidence-Man, riffing ironically on what Orville Dewey had said in praise of laughter, in those widely beloved Lowell lectures on Human Destiny:

Humor is, in fact, so blessed a thing, that even in the least virtuous product of the human mind, if there can be found but nine good jokes, some philosophers are clement enough to affirm that those nine good jokes should redeem all the wicked thoughts, though plenty as the populace of Sodom. At any rate, this same humor has something, there is no telling what, of beneficence in it, it is such a catholicon and charm—nearly all men agreeing in relishing it, though they may agree in little else—and in its way it undeniably does such a deal of familiar good in the world, that no wonder it is almost a proverb, that a man of humor, a man capable of a good loud laugh—seem how he may in other things—can hardly be a heartless scamp."

"Ha, ha, ha!" laughed the other, pointing to the figure of a pale pauper-boy on the deck below, whose pitiableness was touched, as it were, with ludicrousness by a pair of monstrous boots, apparently some mason's discarded ones, cracked with drouth, half eaten by lime, and curled up about the toe like a bassoon. "Look—ha, ha, ha!"

"I see," said the other, with what seemed quiet appreciation, but of a kind expressing an eye to the grotesque, without blindness to what in this case accompanied it, "I see; and the way in which it moves you, Charlie, comes in very apropos to point the proverb I was speaking of. Indeed, had you intended this effect, it could not have been more so. For who that heard that laugh, but would as naturally argue from it a sound heart as sound lungs? True, it is said that a man may smile, and smile, and smile, and be a villain; but it is not said that a man may laugh, and laugh, and laugh, and be one, is it, Charlie?"

"Ha, ha, ha!—no no, no no."

theorists and their popularity

Orville Dewey (1794-1882)
Unitarian minister, lecturer on "The Problem of Human Destiny"

"The mass of Mardians do not believe because they know, but because they know not. And they are as ready to receive one thing as another, if it comes from a canonical source…. I sometimes fancy, that our theorists divert themselves with the greediness of Mardians to believe.” (Mardi)

C.  "But even science is at fault—philosophy at a discount. The public mind is occupied with the theorism of demagogues and infidels, who, abandoning themselves to licentious speculations on human destiny, attract multitudes of fanatical followers, whose minds they bewilder, and whose morals they debase." (June 1852; and Scenes and Adventures in the Army)