That
allusion to Cortez (Hernán Cortés) and conspiracy in the August 1852 installment of Scenes Beyond the Western Border probably refers to the 1521 assassination plot led by Antonio de Villafana. Many versions of the story exist,
in poetry as well as
prose, including a volume of
Uncle Philip's Conversations. According to William Robertson, Cortes learned of the plot and
repaired instantly to Villefagna's [Robertson's spelling] quarters,
accompanied by some of his most trusty officers. The astonishment and
confusion of the man at this unexpected visit anticipated the confession
of his guilt.
Cortes, while his
attendants seized the traitor, snatched from his bosom a paper,
containing the association, signed by the conspirators. Impatient to know how far the infection extended, he retired to read it, and found
there names which filled him with surprise and sorrow. But aware how
dangerous a strict scrutiny might prove at such a juncture, he confined
his judicial inquiries to Villefagna alone. As the proofs of his guilt
were manifest, he was condemned after a short trial, and next morning he
was seen hanging before the door of the house in which he had lodged.
Cortes called
his troops together, and having explained to them the atrocious purpose
of the conspirators, as well as the justice of the punishment inflicted
on Villefagna, he added, with an appearance of satisfaction, that he
was entirely ignorant with respect to all the circumstances of this dark
transaction, as the traitor, when arrested, had suddenly torn and
swallowed a paper which probably contained an account of it, and under
the severest tortures possessed such constancy as to conceal the names
of his accomplices. This artful declaration restored tranquility to
many a breast that was throbbing, while he spoke, with con
sciousness of guilt and dread of detection; and by this prudent moderation,
Cortes had
the advantage of having discovered, and of being able to observe such
of his followers as were disaffected; while they, flattering themselves
that their past crime was unknown, endeavoured to avert any
suspicion of it by redoubling their activity and zeal in his service.
(William Robertson)
Some accounts emphasize that Cortés only
pretended that Villafana had swallowed the paper naming the conspirators.
According to Prescott, Villafana actually did attempt to swallow the paper.
A review of Prescott in the
Southern Quarterly Review reports that Cortés "destroyed the scroll" without stating how:
He destroyed the scroll, and contented himself with the execution of the
one ringleader. The conspirators trembled, but without cause. The
magnanimous judgment of Cortes forbore farther inquiry. In an address to his troops, he told them that the guilty man had made no confession. His admirable policy never once suffered them to suppose that he had any suspicion of the guilty parties
Other sources likewise credit the actions of Cortés as great
"policy." One biography refers to the ingested paper ruse as a
"master stroke of policy," again the word used in the 1852 dialogue of C. and F.
So far I have not found any report saying that Cortés burned the evidence of conspiracy, unread.
Possibly the reference in Scenes Beyond the Western Border merges two averted rebellions from the history of Cortes and the Spanish conquest of Mexico. First confronted with conspiracy, Cortés famously destroyed his fleet at Veracruz to prevent discontented men from deserting to Cuba. Legend has it that Cortés
burned his ships. Even now
"burn the ships" or something to the effect of burning your boats is a proverb of business success and life wisdom. Nit-pickers insist Cortes scuttled his ships but did not actually set fire to them:
There is a popular misconception that Cortés burned the ships instead of scuttling them. This may have come from a mistranslation of the version of the story written in Latin. (New World Encyclopedia)
Here again is the 1852 text as first printed in the Southern Literary Messenger:
F. " At last you have struck a chord that answers as to
the touch of truth! And as for love, I know none better than that of the
she-bear for her cub; and that lasts, and is returned, just so long as circumstance and interest bind."
C. "O! my friend! Is there not then a pure soul-love, a deathless
friendship, "passing the love of women," which all life's trials and the
world's baseness cannot soil or sap? If that be truth, 'twere better never to look into her Medusa face! O! better to cherish enthusiasm, (despite the sneers and ridicule of cold, calculating woman;) better, (as it would become) a blind heroism of credulity! Ay, a heroism of policy, —like that of the great Cortez, who burnt, unread, the proofs of a conspiracy, rather than embrace damning doubt."
(Scenes Beyond the Western Border, August 1852); and with significant revisions in Scenes and Adventures in the Army)
1857 book version:
"If that were truth, better never to look into her Medusa
face; better to cherish illusion: blind credulity would be
heroism! ay,—and policy,—like that of the great Cortez,
who burnt the proofs of a conspiracy, rather than foster
damning doubt."